ANALISIS KUALITAS LAYANAN ANGKUTAN UMUM PENUMPANG (MINIBUS) KOTA DENPASAR BERDASARKAN PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT DENGAN  METODE CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS

Ida Bagus Wirahaji; I Wayan Muka

doi:10.32795/widyateknik.v19i1.4476

Ida Bagus Wirahaji Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Hindu Indonesia
I Wayan Muka Program Studi Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Hindu Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32795/widyateknik.v19i1.4476

Keywords: Public Transportation, Service Quality, SEM AMOS

Abstract

Public transportation in the city of Denpasar reached its peak in the 1990s with the latest fleet being minibus-type public passenger cars with a capacity of 8-10 people. Along with the pace of motorization and ease of buying cars and motorbikes, there can be an increase in private vehicle ownership in the community. The interest of the people in Denpasar City's use of public transportation has decreased significantly. The community can finally feel and have perceptions about the difference between the advantages of using private vehicles and the quality of public transportation services. The purpose of this study was to explore public perceptions of the quality of public transport services, by distributing 400 questionnaires in all sub-districts of Denpasar City. Data on respondents' perceptions were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM). Based on the results of the analysis, there are seven indicators that shape people's perceptions of the quality of public transport, namely: small fleet availability, long waiting and travel times, less convenience, irregular time headway, low frequency of arrivals, and accessibility. The reduced availability of public transport is caused by long waiting times and low frequency of arrivals. Low accessibility due to long travel time. Thus, the quality of services like this in the community makes the use of public transportation in the city of Denpasar decreased.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arbuckle, J.L., dan Wothke, W. 1995. AMOS 4.0 User’s Guide. Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.

Bentler, P.M. 1988. Causal modeling via structural equation systems. In J.R. Nesselroade & R.B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 317–335). New York: Plenum.

Beritafajartimur. 2022. Layanan Metro Bus Kini Jadi Pilihan Masyarakat Bali. Tersedia: https://beritafajartimur.com/2022/05/10/layanan-metro-bus-kini-jadi-pilihan-masyarakat-bali/. Diakses 20 Maret 2023.

BPS Bali. 2021. Bali dalam Angka. Denpasar: Badan Pusat Statistik ProvinsiBali.

Brown, M.W., dan Cudeck, R. 1993. "Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit." In Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long, 136-162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Byrne, B.M. 2016. Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS : Basic concepts, Applications and Progamming 3nd. New York: Routledge.

Collier, J.E. 2020. Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. London: Routledge.

Currie, G., dan Senbergs, Z. 2007. Identifying Spatial Gaps in Public Transport Provision for Socially Disadvantaged Australians - The Melbourne 'Needs Gap' Study. Melbourne Australia: Australasian Transport Research Forum.

Dell’Olio, L., Ibeas, A., dan Cecin, P. 2011. "The quality of service desired by public transport users." Transport Policy 18(1):217-227.

Eboli, L., dan Mazzulla, G. 2008. "Willingness-to-pay of public transport users for improvement in service quality." European TransportTransporti Europei 38:107-118.

Ferdinand, A. 2006. Structural Equation Modeling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponogoro.

Ghozali, I. 2021. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 26. 10 ed. Semarang: BP Undip.

Ghozali, I., dan Fuad. 2005. Structural Equation Modeling-Teori, Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program LISREL 8.54. Semarang: BP Universitas Diponogoro.

Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., dan Black, W. 1998. Multivarite Data Analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., dan Anderson, R.E. 2010. Multivariate data Analysis. 7th ed. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.

Hanike, Y.D. 2018. "Modifikasi Model Analisis Structural Equation Model (SEM) pada Reaksi Pasar di Perusahaan Bursa Efek Ndonesia Melalui Modification Indices." Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran 6(2), Desember 2018:127-142.

Holmes, S. 2001. Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling Using LISREL. Perth: ACSPRI-Winter Training Program.

Istianto, B. 2019. Transportasi Jalan Di Indonesia-Sejarah dan Perkembangannya. Depok: Melvana

Joreskog, K., dan Sorbom, D. 1996. Lisril 8. User's Reference Guide. Chicago: Inc.

Loader, C., dan Stanley, J. 2009. "Growing Buas Patronage and Addressing Transport Disadvantage- the Melborne Experience." Transport Policy 16(3):106-114.

MacCallum, R.C., Roznowski, M., dan Necowitz, L.B. 1992. "Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance." Psychological Bulletin 111:490-504.

Molinero, A., dan Sanchez, L. 1997. "Transporte Publico: Planeacion, Diseno, Operacion Y Administracion. Publicaciones UAEM."

Murat, Y.S., dan Cakici, Z. 2017. "Comparative Analysis of Public Transport Users' Perception Targeting Sustainable Transportation." Engineering Tools and Solutions for Sustainable Transportation Planning:23. doi: 10.4018/978-1-5225-2116-7.ch004.

Ngoc, A.M., Hung, K.V., dan Tuan, V.A. 2017. "Towards the Development of Quality Standards for Public Transport Service in Developing Countries: Analysis of Public Transport Users’ Behavior." Transportation Research Procedia 25 4560–4579.

Nguyen, P.D.Q., Currie, G., De Gruyter, C., dan Young, W. 2018. "How do public transport users adjust their travel behaviour if public transport ceases? A qualitative study." Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 54:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.009

Redman, L., Friman, M., Garling, T., dan Hartig, T. 2013. "Quality Attributes of Public Transport that Attract Car Users." Transport Policy 25:119-127.

Santuri, T.P., dan Baharom, N.A.B. 2018. "The Public Perception of Public Transportation in Malaysia." Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education 2(2):135-140.

Slovin, M. 1960. Sampling. New York: Simon nd Schuster Inc.

Soza-Parra, J., Raveau, S., dan Muñoz, J.C. 2021. Travel preferences of public transport users under uneven headways, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. Chile: Department of Transport Engineering and Logistics Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.

Steg, L. 2003. "Can Public Transport Compete with the Private Car?" IATSS Research 27(2):27-35.

Sugiyanto, G. 2008. "Biaya Kemacetan Mobil Pribadi di Central Business District (Studi Kasus Kwasan Malioboro Jogjakarta)." Media Teknik Sipil:59-66.

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bnadung: Alfabeta.

Tabachnick, B., dan Fidell, L. 2001. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th Edition ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Waluyo, M. 2016. Mudah Cepat Tepat Penggunaan Tools Amos Dalam Aplikasi (SEM). Surabaya: UPN Veteran.