Erpangir Ku Lau Ritual: Between Religion and Identity

  • Vanesia Amelia Sebayang Dept. of Ethnomusicology, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Asmyta Surbakti DVE of Travel, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Torang Naiborhu Dept. of Ethnomusicology, Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara
Keywords: Karo society, colonialism, Erpangir Ku Lau, identity

Abstract

Erpangir ku lau is a ritual of the Karo people based on old religion called Pemena, as a medium for self-cleaning to maintain the sanctity of the body and spirit of a human being. Humans who have been physically and spiritually clean are having been kept away from evil inflences so that they are worthy of getting closer to their ancestors, the universe’s spirit, andalso God. However, while Christianity zending is carried out by the Dutch missionary unionin Tanah Karo in 1890-1904, all of the traditional customary and cultural practices towards ancestor and God were prohibited to be done. The Dutch aiming to change the Karo people’s perception of their own cultural identity. Nowadays, The Karo people divided into several groups, each with their understanding of the cultural customs of their ancestors, including the erpangir ku lau. This research uses a qualitative descriptive research method. The theories used are deconstruction and postcolonial theory. The results of this research were erpangir ku lau is a human ways to communicate with their God while maintaining a harmonious relationship between humans, the universe, and their ancestors. It has been proven that erpangir ku lau ritual is black magic worship was fully a colonial construction. Erpangir ku lau is a root that shapes the identity of the Karo people, known as metami, melias, mehamat, perkuah, and perkeleng. Even though they were no longer adhere to ancestral beliefs, the Karo people should reinterpret the identity-forming moral values contained in the erpangir ku lau ritual and then attach them side by side with whatever beliefs they currently hold.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alisyahbana. 1985. Sejarah Kebudayaan Indonesia: Dilihat dari Segi Nilai-Nilai. Jakarta: PT. Dian Rakyat.

Bérubé. 2005. Cultural Studies or Comparative Literature. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania University Press.

Bungin, B. 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.

Dirks, N.B. (ed.). 1992. Colonialism and Culture: The Comparative Studies in Society and History Book Series. USA: The University of Michigan Press.

Giddens, A. 2014. Konsekuensi- Konsekuensi Modernitas. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Jenkins, R. 2004. Social Identity. New York: Routledge.

Lubis, A.Y. 2006. Dekonstruksi Epistemologi Modern: Dari Posmodernisme, Teori Kritis, Poskolonialisme Hingga Cultural Studies. Jakarta: Pustaka Indonesia Satu.

Lubis, A.Y. 2016. Pemikiran Kritis Kontemporer: Dari Teori Kritis, Culture Studies, Feminisme, Postkolonial, hingga Multikulturalisme. Jakarta: RajaGrafidoPersada.

Putro, B. 1979. Karo dari Zaman ke Zaman. Medan: Ulih Saber.

Sebayang, V.A. 2020. “Ritual Erpangir Ku Lau: Upaya Reklaim Identitas Masyarakat Karo atas Konstruksi Wacana Kolonial Belanda” (disertasi). Program Doktor (S3) Kajian Budaya, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Udayana.

Sharp. J.P. 2009. Geographies of Postcolonialism: Spaces of Power and Representation. UK: Sage Publication Ltd.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 5 tahun 2017 tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan.

Published
2022-06-02
How to Cite
Sebayang, V., Surbakti, A., & Naiborhu, T. (2022). Erpangir Ku Lau Ritual: Between Religion and Identity. International Journal of Interreligious and Intercultural Studies, 5(1), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.32795/ijiis.vol5.iss1.2022.2849