Addressing Lake Nyasa-Malawi Border Dispute between Tanzania and Malawi: From Independence to Present

  • Naisiligaki Loisimaye
Keywords: Border Dispute, Heligoland Treaty, Lake Nyasa-Malawi, Tanzania and Malawi

Abstract

This paper has addressed the on-going problem of Lake Nyasa-Malawi border dispute between Tanzania and Malawi, and analysed the issue from independence to present. This exploratory qualitative research has studied and answered three fold questions; why Tanzania haven’t used violence over Lake Nyasa-Malawi border dispute, how to define and re-define borders as peacebuilding effort, and what are the possible way(s) forward to curb with the withering problem. The findings from documented analysis revealed that Tanzanian leaders use non- violence approach and defensive doctrine to resolve emerging disputes. While Malawi uses Heligoland treaty to define its border over Lake Nyasa-Malawi, Tanzania uses international law to defend its claim over the median line over the Lake. Re-defining border as peacebuilding effort is an important mechanism as borders in Africa are not our creation therefore it is important to re-define our borders to avoid threat of peace. This research suggests the following measures to curb with withering problem, no harm principle that requires states to exercise due diligence in the utilization of shared water resources to avoid significant damage to other basin states where the lake flows in the southern part, the doctrine of no man’s land, and finally resolving disputes is tough and complicated but Africa must unite and do away with borders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Anyu, N. (2007). “International Court of Justice and Border-Conflict Resolution in Africa: The Bakassi Peninsular Conflict.” in Mediterranean Quarterly Volume 18 (3).
2. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Routledge Publishers.
3. Alexander, R. (1999). Science, History and the Kasikili Island Dispute. South African Journal of Science. Vol. 95 (8).
4. Bannon, I. and Collier, P. (2003). “Natural Resouces and Conflict: What We Can Do”. In Natural Resources and Violent Conflict. Washington D.C.: World Bank.

5. Baye, F. (2014). Implications of the Bakassi Conflict Resolution for Cameroon. Cameroon: University of Yaounde.
6. Che-Mponda, A. (1972). The Malawi- Tanzania border and territorial dispute, 1968: A case study of boundary and territorial imperatives in the new Africa. PhD Thesis, Howard University
7. Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A. (1998). On economic causes of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers, 50, pp. 563–573.
8. Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3): 167-191.
9. Herbst, J. (2000). Economic incentives, natural resources and conflict in Africa. Journal of African Economies, Vol. 9(3).
10. Issaka, M. and Ngandu, K. (2008). Lessons from Bakassi and the Greentree Agreement. In Pacific Settlements of Border Disputes. New York: International Peace Institute.
11. Ikome, F. N. (2012). Africa's international borders as potential sources of conflict and future threats to peace and security. Institute for Security Studies Papers, 2012(233), 16.
12. Kornpobst, M. (2002). The Management of Border Disputes in African Regional SubSystems: Comparing West Africa and the Horn of Africa. In Journal of African Modern Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Kenneth, A. N. (2016). Mediating the Lake Nyasa border dispute between Tanzania and Malawi (Doctoral dissertation).
14. Kolossov, V., & Scott, J. (2013). Selected conceptual issues in border studies. Belgeo. Revue belge de géographie, 1, 2-16.
15. Masina, L. (2012). Malawi, Tanzania Lock Horns Over Lake. Accessed on August 10, 2012
16. Mayall, J. (1973). ‘The Malawi- Tanzania boundary dispute’, Journal of Modern African Studies, Vol. 11 (4
17. Maundi, M., Khadiagala, G., Nuamah, K., and Zartman, I. (2008). Getting In: Mediators Entry into the Settlements of African Conflicts. Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.
18. Max Weber, Politics as a vocation, in HH Gerth and C Wright Mills (eds), From

Max Weber: essays in sociology, New York: Oxford University Press, 1958, 78
19. Oduntan, G. (2017). Why Malawi and Tanzania should stick to Mediation to Lake Boundary Dispute. Accessed July 4, 2017
20. Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world.
McKinsey Quarterly, (3), 3-19.
21. Paasi, A. (2018). Borderless worlds and beyond: challenging the state-centric cartographies. In Borderless Worlds for Whom? Routledge Publishers. (pp. 21- 36).
22. SE Finer, (1974). State building, state boundaries, and border control, Social Science Information 13 (4/5) (1974), 79
23. Winichakul, T. (1997). Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation. University of Hawaii Press.
24. Zotto, J. (2013). Colonial Cartography and the Mandate System: Implications for the Tanzania- Malawi Border Dispute. In Africa Peace and Conflict Journal. Vol. 6 (3). Addis Ababa: University for Peace
Published
2024-10-31
How to Cite
Naisiligaki Loisimaye. (2024). Addressing Lake Nyasa-Malawi Border Dispute between Tanzania and Malawi: From Independence to Present. International Journal of Interreligious and Intercultural Studies, 7(2), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.32795/ijiis.vol7.iss2.2024.6786