Bali Traditional Architecture: Sustainability from the Perspective of Capital Concept
Abstract
This study aims to reveal the sustainability of Balinese traditional residential architectural practices which are based on the provisions of traditional ethnic Balinese social stratification and refers to the capital ownership in Generative Structural Theory from Pierre Bourdieu (economic, cultural, social and symbolic). At present, there are dynamics ownership and capital conversion in the traditional social strata which affect the sustainability of traditional residential architecture practices. The traditional Balinese residential architecture in this study is understood to be the spatial layout and traditional residential buildings of the Middle Bali era. Its sustainability today is seen from the concept of capital in the perspective of Bourdieu’s theory. The basic assumption of Bourdieu’s theory is basically that humans are in the field of social struggle to emerge victorious by competing with one another. This study is a qualitative research with interpretative descriptive method. Primary data were obtained from selected informants (purposive) and from field observations, as well as secondary data from the literature. The study findings show that traditional residential architecture practices in the Middle Bali era were strongly influenced by capital ownership (economic, cultural, social, and symbolic) with various forms of conversion to traditional Balinese aristocratic (triwangsa). Development at this time has opened the opportunity to control various capital for ordinary community (jabawangsa), so that the realm of Balinese traditional housing becomes a medium of struggle as well as a symbol of success in social struggle. On the other hand, the contestation of Balinese traditional residential architectural practices is a sustainability in the arena of social struggle within Balinese society today.
Downloads
References
[2] Mahar, C., R. Harker, and C. Wilkes, “Posisi Teoritis Dasar†in (Habitus X Modal) + Ranah = Praktik. Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2009, pp.16.
[3] Bourdieu, P., Arena Produksi Kultural, Sebuah Kajian Sosiologi Budaya (trans. Yudi Santoso) Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2016, pp. xix.
[4] Suastika, I K., Asta Kosala Kosali. Denpasar: Tim Alih Aksara, Alih Bahasa Lontar Dinas Kebudayaan Pemerintah Provinsi Bali, 2007a, pp. 172.
[5] Suastika, I K., Asta Bhumi. Denpasar: Tim Alih Aksara, Alih Bahasa Lontar Dinas Kebudayaan Pemerintah Provinsi Bali, 2007b, pp. 2.
[6] Geertz, H., and C. Geertz, Sistem Kekerabatan di Bali. Denpasar: Udayana University Press, 2017, pp. 9.
[7] Diantha, M.P., I G.P.E. Wisanjaya, Kasta dalam Perspektif Hukum dan HAM. Denpasar: CV. Bali Media Adhikarsa, 2010, pp. 6.
[8] Ardika, I W., I G. Parimartha, and A.A. B. Wirawan, Sejarah Bali dari Prasejarah Hingga Modern. Denpasar: Udayana University Press, 2015, pp. 317.
[9] Utama, I W.B., Wajah Bali Tanpa Kasta Pudarnya Identitas Bali Aga. Denpasar: Pustaka Ekpresi bekerjasama dengan Program Pascasarjana Universitas Hindu Indonesia Denpasar, 2015, pp. 195.
[10] Wijaya, N., 2003, “Melawan Ajeg Bali: Antara Eksklusivitas dan Komersialisasiâ€. Available on https://simdos.unud.ac.id/up-loads/file_riwayat_penelitian_1_dir/3fbee41f73964b9252b7b0f df97a75a8.pdf. (access on January 20, 2020).
[11] Harker, R. C. Mahar, C. Wilkes, (Habitus X Modal) + Ranah = Praktik. Pengantar Paling Komprehensif kepada Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra, 2009, pp. xxi.
[12] Haryamoko, Membongkar Rezim Kepastian Pemikiran Kritis Post-Strukturalis. Yogyakarta: PT Kanisius, 2016, pp. 57.
Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Interreligious and Intercultural Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.